基于文献计量分析的蚁科昆虫研究
A bibliometric review of research on the Formicidae
高冬梅；高立洪；李 萍；董毛村；潘润东；徐正会；郭 萧
点击：633次 下载：44次
DOI：10.7679/j.issn.2095-1353.2021.023
作者单位：1. 重庆市农业科学院，重庆 401329；2. 西南林业大学生物多样性保护学院， 云南省森林灾害预警与控制重点实验室，昆明 650224
中文关键词：蚁科；文献计量分析；Citespace；知识图谱；研究进展
英文关键词：Formicidae; bibliometric analysis; Citespace; knowledge mapping; research progress
中文摘要：
【目的】 明确我国蚂蚁研究与世界先进水平的差距所在，以期为挖掘蚂蚁研究热点提供思路，为我国蚂蚁研究追赶世界先进水平提供努力方向。【方法】 通过检索中国学术期刊出版总库和Web of Science数据库，获取近年来国内外有关蚂蚁研究的相关文献题录，借助Citespace软件，利用文献计量学方法，对国内外蚂蚁研究的发文数量、发文国家、发文机构、发文作者、关键词等数据进行分析。归纳总结出当前研究蚂蚁热点、领先国家、高水平作者及高发文期刊。【结果】 在发文数量方面，美国领先全球，但中国自2006年以来，快速进步，目前基本与日本和法国持平；从关键词分析来看，国际上关于蚂蚁研究较为全面，国内在蚂蚁行为与进化等方面还需努力；从发文作者来看，我国能与国际蚂蚁研究大家相比的学者数量较少，不同学者间实力悬殊较大，不利于该学科可持续发展；从发文机构来看，我国从事蚂蚁研究的机构多集中在南方，并且缺乏具有国际影响力的蚂蚁研究机构；此外，蚂蚁外文文献载文期刊数量与期刊平均载文量均高于中文期刊。【结论】 1996年以后，我国蚂蚁研究开始快速发展，目前，在年发文数量方面，基本与日本和法国持平，居于世界前10。但在高影响力作者（机构）、研究团队结构、研究领域、载文期刊质量与数量等方面与发达国家相比还有欠缺，还需在相关方面进一步努力。
英文摘要：
[Objectives] To clarify the gap between China and the rest of the world in ant research and provide direction for future research. [Methods] A literature search was conducted of the Publishing Database of Chinese academic journals and Web of Science database to obtain recent ant research literature from China and overseas. Citespace software and bibliometric methods were used to determine the number of papers, their country of origin, authors’ names and institution, and key words. Current topics in ant research, ant research in developed countries, influential authors and major journals, were summarized. [Results] The United States leads the world in the number of articles published but China has made rapid progress since 2006 and has now published about the same number of articles as Japan and France. Keyword analysis indicates that ant research is more comprehensive overseas than in China where more research is required on ant behavior and evolution. China also has fewer influential authors than other countries and there is greater disparity in academic achievement among different scholars, which is not conducive to the continued development of this field of research. Most Chinese publishing agencies and institutions engaged in ant research are concentrated in the south of the country and China lacks internationally influential ant research institutes. Most ant research is published in foreign journals and the average number of ant publications in foreign journals is higher than in Chinese journals. [Conclusion] Ant research in China has develop rapidly since 1996. At present, the number of ant research articles published annually in China is almost the same as in Japan and France, which means that China ranks among the top 10 countries in the world. However, compared with developed countries, there are still shortcomings in the number of high-impact authors, globally recognized institutions, research team structure, research fields, and in the quality and quantity of published journals. Further effort is needed to rectify these shortcomings.