Latest Cover

Online Office

Contact Us

Issue:ISSN 2095-1353
           CN 11-6020/Q
Director:Chinese Academy of Sciences
Sponsored by:Chinese Society of Entomological;institute of zoology, chinese academy of sciences;
Address:Chaoyang District No. 1 Beichen West Road, No. 5 hospital,Beijing City,100101, China
Tel:+86-10-64807137
Fax:+86-10-64807137
Email:entom@ioz.ac.cn
Your Position :Home->Past Journals Catalog->2015年52 No.5

Relative efficiency of three trap types for monitoring longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)
Author of the article:LI Lu-Yao** MENG Qing-Fan*** LI Yan GAO Wen-Tao
Author's Workplace:College of Forestry, Beihua University, Jilin 132013, China
Key Words:trap types, longhorn beetles, trap efficiency
Abstract:

  [Objectives]  Insect traps of different designs can sample some species more effectively than others. In order to estimate regional species richness more accurately, and detect a variety of species more efficiently, it’s important to determine the relative efficiency of different trap types. [Methods]  We compared the quantity and species diversity of longhorn beetles captured in funnel, intercept  and Malaise traps in Mongolian oak forest at Songhua Lake in Jilin Province. [Results]  The funnel trap captured a total of 189 longhorn beetles (4 subfamilies, 11 genera and 12 species), the intercept trap captured 134 specimens (5 subfamilies, 15 genera and 17 species), and the Malaise trap captured 99 specimens (4 subfamilies, 16 genera, 18 species). The relative ranking of the three trap types was, in terms of species richness, Malaise trap > intercept trap > funnel trap; in terms of absolute abundance, funnel trap > intercept trap > Malaise trap; and in terms of trapping dominant species, funnel trap > intercept trap > Malaise trap. [Conclusion]  A combination of intercept and funnel traps, supplemented with Malaise traps, should be the most efficient and economical method for trapping longhorn beetles.

 

CopyRight©2024 Chinese Journal of Aplied Entomology