Instar identification and characteristic analysis of Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae (Hemiptera: Aphididae)
Author of the article:LI Qian1, 2** WANG Pan2 ZHOU Li-Lin2 WANG Yong2 YANG Fan2 SI Sheng-Yun2*** LI Chao1***
Author's Workplace:1. Key Laboratory of the Pest Monitoring and Safety Control of Crops and Forests, College of Agronomy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China; 2. Institute of Vegetables, Wuhan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430345, China
Key Words:Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae; instar; size; antennae node number; tail shape; wing base length
Abstract:
[Aim] The external morphological characteristics of
each Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae instar
was documented to facilitate rapid instar identification for future studies. [Methods]
The morphological characteristics of R. nymphaeae were observed under the
microscope, including measurements of body length, body width, and headshell
width. The antennae, cornicle, cauda, hindfoot tibia, and wing base were
measured after pressing. Differential and correlational analyses were carried out
on the measurement data, followed by construction of box plots, to investigate
the morphological variations across different developmental stages. [Results] The antennae of 1st instar R. nymphaeae nymphs consisted of 4 or 5 segments. Similarly, 5 segments were
observed in 2nd instar nymphs, while the antennae of 3rd instar nymphs had 5 or
6 segments. The antennae of 4th instar nymphs and older had 6 segments. No
cauda or half-moon to triangle cauda were observed in 1st or 2nd instar nymphs,
whereas half-moon to triangle cauda were observed in the 3rd and 4th instar
nymphs. A cone-shaped cauda was observed in adult R. nymphaeae. In the winged morph of R. nymphaeae nymphs,
differentiation of the wing base was observed to start at the 3rd
instar. At this stage, the wing base extends from the first to the middle of
the first ventral segment. By the 4th instar, the
wing base extends further to the second to fourth ventral segment. Significant
differences and correlations were observed between the morphological
characteristics measured at different instars. However, the distribution of
values for these characteristics tended to overlap between the different instar
stages. The absence of an overlap may serve as a key indicator for age
identification. For example, the wing base length of winged 3rd-4th instar
nymph. A small amount of overlap can be used as an important indicator for
instar identification, such as the body length of wingless 1st-4th instar nymphs. Partial overlapping values can serve as an
auxiliary index for instar identification, such as the length of hindfoot tibia
of wingless 3rd-4th instar nymphs. [Conclusion] The number of antennae segments, cauda
development, and the presence and length of the wing base can serve
as key indices for determining the age of R.
nymphaeae. The progressive increase in each index was correlated strongly
with instar stage, providing a reliable reference index for determining R. nymphaeae age.