Using DNA metabarcoding and light-trap samples to investigate the diet of two scarab beetles
Author of the article:GONG Zhong-Jun1** ZHANG Jing1 XU Yong-Wei2 LI Ke-Bin3 JIANG Yue-Li1 DUAN Yun1 LI Tong1 LI Hui
Author's Workplace:1. Key Laboratory of Integrated Crop Pests Management on Crops in Southern Region of North China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Henan Key Laboratory of Agricultural Pest Monitoring and Control, Institute of Plant Protection, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, China; 2. Plant Protection and Quarantine Station of Henan, Zhengzhou 450002, China; 3. State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
Key Words:scarab beetles; insect diet; DNA metabarcoding; insect monitoring lamp; insect gut
Abstract:
[Aim] To quickly identify the host plant composition and dietary
diversity of two phytophagous scarab beetles, Holotrichia parallela and Anomala
corpulenta. Using DNA metabarcoding and light trapping, the feeding
preferences of these beetles were analyzed to provide a scientific basis for
the environmentally-friendly control of these pests. [Methods] Samples
were collected using two methods, manual trapping of live beetles and automated
collection via lethal infrared monitoring lamps. Guts of both live trapped and lamp-killed
beetles were dissected, and total DNA was extracted from the gut
contents. The trnL gene
was amplified by PCR and sequenced on a high-throughput platform. The resulting
sequences were compared against the NCBI database for taxonomic assignment.
Both Alpha and Beta diversity were calculated and used to compare the diversity
and composition of the plants consumed by each species. [Results] Analysis of H. parallela gut contents revealed a
diet dominated by a few plant species, primarily Prunus pseudocerasus, Bothrocaryum controversum and Salix babylonica. Of these, P. pseudocerasus was the most prevalent,
with a relative abundance of 68.56%. In contrast, A. corpulenta had a more generalist diet, which included P. pseudocerasus (24.62%), Malus honanensis (19.02%), S. babylonica (14.61%) and Robinia pseudoacacia (10.70%). The Alpha
and Beta diversity indices obtained using both two sampling methods (fresh
samples from live-caught specimens and dry samples from light-trap killed
specimens) were compared, and no significant differences (P> 0.05) were found. Both types of sample accurately reflected
the abundance, and evenness, of ingested plant species, as well as the
feeding preferences and dietary diversity of each species. [Conclusion] The
integration of plant DNA barcoding and high-throughput sequencing effectively
enables rapid and efficient identification of the plants consumed by
phytophagous insects. Gut samples obtained from pest monitoring lamps can
reliably reveal the natural dietary composition of the target species. These results
support the development of food-web based ecological regulation, and the
development of environmentally-friendly pest control strategies.