Study on host selection of Anoplohora glabripennis to several tree species in the Hexi Corridor
Author of the article:ZHAO Chen-Yin1** WANG Gai-Jin1 YANG Zong-Ji1 WANG Xuan1 LI Wen-Xing2 REN Li-Li3 LUO You-Qing3
Author's Workplace:1. College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2. Forestry and Grassland Bureau of Jiayuguan City, Jiayuguan 735100, China; 3. Beijing Key Laboratory for Forest Pest Control, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Key Words:Anoplophora glabripennis; host species; species selection; Elaeagnus angustifolia
Abstract:
[Aim] To determine the relative
preference of the Asian longhorned beetle, Anoplophora glabripennis, for
ovipositing on the Russian olive tree, Elaeagnus angustifolia, a species
with the ability to kill the eggs and larvae of this pest and that is also a
pioneer tree species for afforestation in the Hexi Corridor region in Gansu
Province. [Methods] The
oviposition preferences of A. glabripennis for different tree species
were tested under laboratory conditions, and combined with field surveys of the
damage caused by A. glabripennis on different tree species in the field.
[Results] Laboratory tests of the
oviposition preferences of A. glabripennis revealed a preference for Populus × xiaohei var. gansuensis, with an average number of oviposition scars of (16.0±4.5)
per segment. This was followed by E. angustifolia and the
insect-susceptible tree species Salix matsudana, with an average of (11.3±2.8)
and (7.5±2.8) oviposition scars per segment, respectively. The least preferred
host species was P. alba var. pyramidalis with only one
oviposition scar. A two-by-two comparison of date palms and other potential
hosts revealed no difference in the number of eggs laid on E. angustifolia compared to other tree species.
In mixed forests planted with E. angustifolia, the numbers of adult A.
glabripennis feeding, perching, mating, scarring and ovipositing, on E.
angustifolia and P. gansuensis were significantly higher than on other tree species (P < 0.05). The numbers of A. glabripennis feeding and scarring on E.
angustifolia were significantly higher than on Salix wilhelmsiana, S. matsudana and P. alba var. pyramidalis (P < 0.05), but were not significantly different than on P. gansuensis (P > 0.05). These results indicate that E. angustifolia is highly attractive to A. glabripennis.
Very few adult A. glabripennis were
found on P. alba var. pyramidalis in
different mixed forest plots, and almost no damage was observed on this
species. There was no
significant difference in the proportion of individual trees of each species
that had A. glabripennis oviposition scars; > 70 % of trees of each
species had scars. [Conclusion] A.
glabripennis has an obvious preference for E. angustifolia for both feeding and oviposition,
which means that the latter can act as a trap-tree to protect the more
susceptible species P. alba var. pyramidalis.