Latest Cover

Online Office

Contact Us

Issue:ISSN 2095-1353
           CN 11-6020/Q
Director:Chinese Academy of Sciences
Sponsored by:Chinese Society of Entomological;institute of zoology, chinese academy of sciences;
Address:Chaoyang District No. 1 Beichen West Road, No. 5 hospital,Beijing City,100101, China
Tel:+86-10-64807137
Fax:+86-10-64807137
Email:entom@ioz.ac.cn
Your Position :Home->Past Journals Catalog->2019年56 No.4

Comparison of the effectiveness of chemical and biological agents for the emergency control of Spodoptera frugiperda in the field
Author of the article:YAN Wen-Juan; YANG Shuai;WANG Yong-Qing;ZHENG Qun;ZHANG Zhi-Xiang;XU Han-Hong
Author's Workplace:Key Laboratory of Natural Pesticides and Chemical Biology, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China;Key Laboratory of Natural Pesticides and Chemical Biology, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China;Key Laboratory of Natural Pesticides and Chemical Biology, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China;Key Laboratory of Natural Pesticides and Chemical Biology, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China;Key Laboratory of Natural Pesticides and Chemical Biology, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China;Key Laboratory of Natural Pesticides and Chemical Biology, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
Key Words:Spodoptera frugiperda; insecticides; pesticide screening; control efficacy
Abstract:[Objectives]  To determine the relative efficacy of 28 chemical and biological agents for controlling Spodoptera frugiperda in maize (Zea mays L.) fields. [Methods]  Entire maize plants at the large trumpet stage were evenly sprayed using conventional spray methods and the number of S. frugiperda larvae on labeled plants determined 1 day before, and 1, 3 and 7, days after, application. [Results]  Chemical pesticides were the most effective at controlling S. frugiperda. Biological agents were not as effective, which we suspect is related to their mode of action. [Conclusion]  Of the chemical agents evaluated, eight, spinetoram, emamectin benzoate, chlorantraniliprole, cyantraniliprole, methoxyfenozide, cyfluthrin, spinetoram·m-ethoxyfenozide and indoxacarb·methoxyfenozide, were the most effective at controlling S. frugiperda in maize fields.
CopyRight©2024 Chinese Journal of Aplied Entomology