iTRAQ proteomic analysis of insecticide resistant, and sensitive, populations of Empoasca flavescens (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) from tea plantations
Author of the article:LI Liang-De;LIU Feng-Jing;LI Hui-Ling;LI Jin-Yu;WANG Ding-Feng
Author's Workplace:Tea Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350012, China;Tea Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350012, China;Tea Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350012, China;Tea Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350012, China;Tea Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350012, China
Key Words:Empoasca flavescens; resistant population; sensitive population; proteomics; detoxification enzyme
Abstract:
[Objectives] To use iTRAQ (isobaric tags for relative and absolute
quantification) techniques to investigate proteomic differences between
resistant (conventional drug management), and sensitive (unmanaged), Empoasca
flavescens populations in tea plantations, thereby providing a
theoretical foundation for managing resistance in this pest. [Methods]
E. flavescens were collected in tea plantations using both random and multi-point sampling
methods. Proteins were extracted and quantified with a protein purification
kit, then enzymatically digested and labeled with an iTRAQ labeling kit.
Peptides were isolated using high pH-RPLC and identified with RPLC-MS. The
molecular function, biological processes, and cell locations of differentially
expressed proteins were analyzed using the GO ontology (Gene ontology) method.
Metabolic pathways were annotated using the KEGG pathway website. The
interaction network of differentially expressed proteins was analyzed with the
String-DB database. Finally, significantly different resistance-related enzyme
proteins were further analyzed and sorted. [Results] A total of 728.23 µg proteins were extracted from sensitive populations and 1 261.17 µg from resistant populations. A total of 1 399 proteins differed
significantly between resistant and sensitive populations. Of these, 101 were up-regulated
and 218 were down-regulated more than 1.5 times. GO analysis indicates that 319
differentially expressed proteins were mainly involved in ion-binding, and in
the composition of ribosomes and oxidoreductase. These proteins mainly function
in protein translation, material transport and small molecule metabolic
processes, and are distributed in the intracellular membrane, cytoplasm,
ribosomes and nucleus, respectively. KEGG analysis indicates that the 319
differentially expressed proteins were mainly involved in the carbon and
ribosomal metabolism, and the phagocytosis pathway. The results of STRING
analysis indicate that the 319 differentially proteins regulated each other via
multiple pathways. Analysis of resistance-related protein enzymes revealed that
three glutathione S-transferase
(GSTs), two cytochrome P450 oxidase (P450), two superoxide dismutase (SOD) and
two peroxide dismutase (POD) were significantly different in sensitive and
resistant populations. [Conclusion] Resistant and sensitive populations of E. flavescens have significant proteomic
differences. Differentially expressed proteins have a variety of molecular
functions and are widely distributed in different cell types. Detoxification
enzyme activity was stronger in the resistant population than in the sensitive
one.