Relationship between the biochemical content of buckwheat leaves, defensive enzyme activity and resistance to Rhinoncus sibiricus
Author of the article:CHEN Lei;WANG Yu-Fei;LI Hai-Ping;MENG Huan-Wen;ZHOU Hong-You
Author's Workplace:College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China;College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China
Key Words:feeding selection; nutrients; secondary metabolites; defensive enzymes; protease inhibitors; insect resistance
Abstract:
[Objectives] To investigate the
relationship between the damage caused by Rhinoncus sibiricus, the
amounts of certain biochemical substances in the leaves of different buckwheat
varieties and defensive enzyme activity, in order to provide information for
selecting pest-resistant varieties of buckwheat. [Methods] The damage caused by R.
sibiricus to buckwheat was investigate using the five-point sampling
method in the field. The relative preference of R. sibiricus for four
different buckwheat varieties (Meng 0208, Meng 0207, Jinku 6, Jinku 2) was
determined in laboratory experiments. The amounts of major nutrients and
secondary metabolites, and defense enzyme and protease inhibitor activity, in
the leaves of different buckwheat varieties, were also determined. [Results] Stem-damage rates on the Meng0208 and Jinku2 buckwheat varieties were
59.22% and 65.23%, respectively; higher than on Meng0207 and Jinku6, which were
47.21% and 49.61%, respectively. The relative preference of R. sibiricus for different buckwheat varieties was: Jinku2>Meng0208>Jinku6>Meng0207. The amounts of soluble protein, soluble sugar, proline,
flavonoids and total phenol in insect-resistant buckwheat varieties were
significantly lower than in insect-sensitive varieties (P<0.05). There was a significant, positive correlation between the
relative preference of R. sibiricus for different buckwheat varieties
and the amount of soluble protein (R=0.840),
soluble sugar (R=0.883), proline (R=0.750), flavonoids (R=0.809) and total phenol (R=0.729) in leaves. The activities of
phenylalanine aminolase, catalase, trypsin inhibitor and chymotrypsin inhibitor
were significantly higher in insect-resistant buckwheat varieties than in
insect-sensitive varieties (P<0.05). There was a significant, negative correlation between the feeding
preferences of R. sibiricus for different buckwheat varieties and
the activities of phenylalanine aminolase (R=﹣0.837), catalase (R=﹣0.548), trypsin
inhibitor (R=﹣0.579) and pancreatic
protease inhibitor (R=﹣0.797) in buckwheat
leaves. [Conclusion] R.
sibiricus significantly preferred feeding on the leaves of Meng0208 and
JinKu2, whereas Meng0207 and Jinku6 had the highest insect resistance respectively among the four buckwheat varieties
tested. The palatability of different buckwheat varieties to R. sibiricus was closely related to their nutrient content, secondary metabolic substances,
defense enzyme activity and protease inhibitor activity.